DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL JUDGMENTS IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITALIZATION

Authors

  • Olga Ignatjeva Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2021.303

Abstract

Discourse analysis of texts and speeches has been one of the most popular research methods since the second half of the XX century. Its emergence is associated with the works of postmodernists, such as Deleuze, J. Derrida, M. Foucault, E. Laclos, and S. Mouffe. The method is interesting because it allows us to take into account the context of expressed judgments and to uncover the implied meaning of statements. Despite the widespread use of this method, no unified methodology has been created. In foreign and Russian science, parallel trends and schools in the field of discourse analysis were formed, the most influential of which is discussed in this article. The emergence of social networks, digital platforms and applications has set a new trend in modifying and creating new variants of discourse analysis of texts and judgments, but already in a digital environment. Some of them, such as Y.G. Misnikov’s approach, can serve as an alternative to studying public opinion by means of a social survey. The purpose of this article is to analyze and systematize both traditional methods of discourse analysis of political judgments and new approaches using social networks, apps, websites, and digital platforms. In the course of the research, the methods of classification and systematization as well as, general scientific methods of analysis and synthesis were used. In the context of digitalization, five varieties of discourse analysis method were considered for text analysis in a digital environment: critical discourse analysis, corpus discourse analysis, mediated discourse analysis, multimodal discourse analysis, and discourse analysis using artificial intelligence. A thorough analysis of these methods allowed us to identify a gap in the analysis of political judgments on digital platforms of interaction between the government and the population, and to propose a variant of filling it on the basis of A. Kruglanski's parametric model.

Keywords:

discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis, social media, mobile applications, neural networks, political judgments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Быков И. А. Сетевая политическая коммуникация: Теория, практика и методы исследования: монография. СПб.: ФГБОУ ВПО «СПГУТД», 2013. 200 с.

Быков И. А., Ахмедова Ю. Д. Культура отмены в политическом дискурсе современной России // Вестник Кабардино-Балкарского университета, 2021. Т. 1, № 1. https://doi.org/10.24334/KBSU.2021.1.1.002

Мартьянов Д. С. Мартьянова Н. А. Управляемость виртуальных сообществ: сравнительный анализ политизированных групп Вконтакте // Журнал политических исследований, 2019. Т. 3, № 3. С. 79–93.

Мисников Ю. Г., Филатова О. Г. Интернет-дискуссия как форма электронного участия: российская специфика // Мониторинг общественного мнения: Экономические и социальные перемены. 2019. № 5. С. 320–340. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2019.5.15

Поппер К. Логика научного исследования. М.: Республика. 2005. 447 с.

Русакова О. Ф. Политическая дискурсология: актуальность исследования и теоретико-методологические основания // Tempus et memoria. 2008. Т. 3, № 6. С. 114–122.

Филлипс Л., Йоргенсен М. В. Дискурс-анализ. Теория и метод: пер. с англ. Харьков: Гуманитарный центр, 2008. 334 с.

Хабермас Ю. Вовлечение Другого. Очерки политической теории. СПб.: Наука. 2001. 417 с.

Шейгал Е. И. Семиотика политического дискурса. М.: Гнозис, 2004. 326 с.

Androutsopoulos J. Participatory culture and metalinguistic discourse: performing and negotiating German dialects on YouTube // Discourse 2.0: language and new media / D. Tannen and A.M. Trester (eds.), Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 2013. P. 47–71.

Bakhtin M. M. The Dialogic Imagination: four essays, trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist, M. Holquist (eds.) Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. 1981. 258 p.

Baker P. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis, London: Continuum. 2006. 198 p.

Benson Ph. YouTube as text: spoken interaction analysis and digital discourse // Discourse and digital practices: doing discourse analysis in the digital age / R. Jones, A. Chik, Ch. Hafner (eds.). London and New York: Routledge. 2015. P. 81–96.

Cheney-Lippold J. A new algorithmic identity: soft biopolitics and the modulation of control // Theory, Culture & Society. 2011. No. 28. P. 164–181.

Dijksterhuis A., van Knippenberg A., Kruglianski A., Schper C. Motivated Social Cognition: Need for Closure Effects on Memory and Judgment // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1996. Vol. 32, article № 0012. P. 254–270.

Fairclough N. Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. 2003. 269 p.

Fairclough N. Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Longman. 1995. 334 p.

Gunelius S. 5 Ways to use content curation for marketing and tools to do it // Forbes. Online. URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/work-in-progress/2012/07/05/5-ways-to-use-content-curation-for-marketing-and-tools-to-do-it/?sh=6bb4100c3e57 (accessed 28 March 2021).

Iedema R. Resemiotization // Semiotica. 2001. Vol. 137, no. 1. P. 23–39.

Jones R. Discourse, cybernetics and the entextualization of the self // Discourse and digital practices: doing discourse analysis in the digital age / R. Jones, A. Chik, Ch. Hafner (eds.). London and New York: Routledge, 2015. P. 28–47.

King B. Investigating digital sex talk practices: a reflection on corpus-assisted discourse analysis // Discourse and digital practices: doing discourse analysis in the digital age / R. Jones, A. Chik, Ch. Hafner (eds.). London and New York: Routledge, 2015. P. 130–143.

Kruglanski A., Orehek E., Dechesne M., Pierro A. Lay Epistemic Theory: The Motivational, Cognitive and Social Aspects of Knowledge Formation // Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2010. Vol. 10, no. 4. P. 939–950. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00308.x

Kruglanski A. W., Pierro A., Mannetti L., Erb H., & Young Chun W. On The Parameters of Human Judgment // Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2007. Vol. 39. P. 255–303.

Kruglanski A. Motivation, Cognition and Realty: Three Memos for the Next Generation of Research // Psychological Inquiry. 1999. Vol. 10, no. 1. P. 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1001_8

Laclau E., Mouffe Ch. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso, 1985. 197 p.

Lemke J. L. Across the scales of time: artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems // Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2000, Vol. 7, no. 4. P. 273–290.

Potter J. Digital Media and Learner Identity: the new curatorship, New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2012. 198 p.

Sinclair J. M. and Coulthard M. Towards an Analysis of Discourse, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975. 163 p.

Snyder I. Discourses of ‘curation’ in digital times // Discourse and digital practices: doing discourse analysis in the digital age / R. Jones, A. Chik, Ch. Hafner (eds.). London and New York: Routledge, 2015. P. 209–225.

REFERENCES (In English)

Androutsopoulos J. Participatory culture and metalinguistic discourse: performing and negotiating German dialects on YouTube. Discourse 2.0: language and new media / D. Tannen and A.M. Trester (Eds.), Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2013. pp. 47-71.

Bakhtin M. M. The Dialogic Imagination: four essays, trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist, M. Holquist (Eds.) Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1981. 258 p.

Baker P. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum Publ., 2006. 198 p.

Benson Ph. YouTube as text: spoken interaction analysis and digital discourse. Discourse and digital practices: doing discourse analysis in the digital age / R. Jones, A. Chik, Ch. Hafner (Eds.). London and New York: Routledge Publ., 2015. pp. 81-96.

Bykov I.A. Network political communication: Theory, practice and research methods: monograph. St Petersburg.: FGBOU VPO "SPGUTD" Publ., 2013. 200 p. (In Russian)

Bykov I. A., Akhmedova Y. D. The Culture of Cancellation in the Political Discourse of Modern Russia. Bulletin of Kabardino-Balkarian University, 2021. Vol. 1, no. 1. https://doi.org/10.24334/KBSU.2021.1.1.002 (In Russian)

Cheney-Lippold J. A new algorithmic identity: soft biopolitics and the modulation of control. Theory, Culture & Society, 2011. no. 28. pp. 164–181.

Dijksterhuis A., van Knippenberg A., Kruglianski A., Schper C. Motivated Social Cognition: Need for Closure Effects on Memory and Judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1996. Vol. 32, article № 0012. pp. 254-270.

Fairclough N. Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge Publ., 2003. 269 p.

Fairclough N. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman Publ., 1995. 334 p.

Gunelius S. 5 Ways to use content curation for marketing and tools to do it // Forbes. Online. URL: 5 Ways to Use Content Curation for Marketing and Tools to Do It (forbes.com) (accessed: 28.03.2021).

Habermas J. Involvement of the Other. Essays on Political Theory. St Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 2001. 417 p. (In Russian)

Iedema R. Resemiotization. Semiotica, 2001, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 23–39.

Jones R. Discourse, cybernetics and the entextualization of the self. Discourse and digital practices: doing discourse analysis in the digital age / R. Jones, A. Chik, Ch. Hafner (Eds.). London and New York: Routledge Publ., 2015. pp. 28-47.

King B. Investigating digital sex talk practices: a reflection on corpus-assisted discourse analysis. Discourse and digital practices: doing discourse analysis in the digital age / R. Jones, A. Chik, Ch. Hafner (Eds.). London and New York: Routledge Publ., 2015. pp. 130-143.

Kruglanski A., Orehek E., Dechesne M., Pierro A. Lay Epistemic Theory: The Motivational, Cognitive and Social Aspects of Knowledge Formation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2010. Vol. 10. no 4. pp. 939-950. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00308.x

Kruglanski A. W., Pierro A., Mannetti L., Erb H., & Young Chun W. On The Parameters of Human Judgment. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2007. Vol. 39. pp. 255–303.

Kruglanski A. Motivation, Cognition and Realty: Three Memos for the Next Generation of Research. Psychological Inquiry, 1999. Vol. 10, no. 1. pp. 53-58. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1001_8

Laclau E., Mouffe Ch. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso Publ., 1985. 197 p.

Lemke J. L. Across the scales of time: artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2000. vol. 7. no. 4. P. 273–290.

Martyanov D. S. Martyanova N. A. Manageability of virtual communities: a comparative analysis of politicized Vkontakte groups. Journal of Political Studies, 2019. Vol. 3 no. 3. pp. 79-93. (In Russian)

Misnikov Y.G., Filatova O.G. Internet discussion as a form of electronic participation: Russian specifics. Public Opinion Monitoring: Economic and Social Changes, 2019. no 5. pp.320-340. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2019.5.15 (In Russian)

Phillips L., Jorgensen M.V. Discourse Analysis. Theory and method: transl. from English. Kharkov: Publishing house "Humanitarian Center", 2008. 334 p. (In Russian)

Popper K. The Logic of Scientific Research. Moscow: Respublika Publ., 2005. 447 p. (In Russian)

Potter J. Digital Media and Learner Identity: the new curatorship, New York: Palgrave MacMillan Publ., 2012. 198 p.

Rusakova O.F. Political discursology: relevance of research and theoretical and methodological foundations. Tempus et memoria, 2008, Vol. 3, no. 6. pp. 114-122. (In Russian)

Sheigal E.I. Semiotics of Political Discourse. Moscow: Gnosis Publ., 2004. 326 с. (In Russian)

Sinclair J. M. and Coulthard M. Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975. 163 p.

Snyder I. Discourses of ‘curation’ in digital times. Discourse and digital practices: doing discourse analysis in the digital age / R. Jones, A. Chik, Ch. Hafner (Eds.). London and New York: Routledge Publ., 2015. pp. 209-225.


Published

2021-10-18

How to Cite

Ignatjeva, O. (2021). DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF POLITICAL JUDGMENTS IN THE CONTEXT OF DIGITALIZATION. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 17(3), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2021.303

Issue

Section

Political culture and ideologies