THE IMAGES OF CHILDHOOD AND CHILDREN IN THE SYMBOLIC POLITICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2019.307Abstract
The article analyzes principal regularities in the use of images of childhood and children in the symbolic politics. The authors note the growing politicization of the issues of childhood in the recent years, which determines academic and social relevance of the child study from the Political Science perspective. The paper shows that the symbol of childhood plays a significant role in the legitimation and delegitimation of power and political system, the discourse of military conflicts, the civilizational discourse and other forms of symbolic politics. The symbol possesses the traits which make it useful for political actors’: the connection to myth and the sacral that determines its ability to trigger strong emotional response; plasticity and subjectivity in interpretation; simplicity of perception; ability to create symbolic boundaries and to serve as a way of inclusion and exclusion. The symbol of childhood appeals to the kinship relations, which contributes to representing the social ties as natural, strong, and legitimate. This symbol helps to bring to the symbolic politics such binary oppositions as culture vs. nature, reason vs. emotions, power vs. submission, freedom vs. dependence, individuality vs. collectivity, actuality vs. potentiality. In making the meanings and evaluations of social reality with the help of this symbol the actors use various mechanisms of symbolic politics: drawing symbolic boundaries, employing conceptual metaphors, resemiotization, visualization, and stereotipization. In spite of variability of its meanings, one can note its core characteristics, and the most significant of them is otherness in regards to the norm - the image of the adult human, above all, that of the adult male, that determines both positive and negative context of employing this symbol. The authors point out that the symbol of childhood has a significant potential for the use in symbolic politics
Keywords:
CHILDHOOD, CHILDREN, SYMBOLIC POLITICS, POLITICAL SYMBOLS, LEGITIMATION OF POWER, WAR PROPAGANDA, POLITICAL MOBILIZATION
Downloads
References
Ариес Ф. Ребенок и семейная жизнь при старом порядке. Екатеринбург: Уральский уни- верситет, 1999. 415 с.
Бергер П., Лукман Т. Социальное конструирование реальности. Трактат по социологии знания. М., 1995. 323 с.
Брежнев Л.И. Участникам Всемирного конгресса, посвященного Международному году женщины // Брежнев Л.И.Ленинским курсом: речи и статьи: в 5 т. Т.5. М., 1976. С.379– 381.
Бугро В. «Родина-мать». URL: https://gallerix.ru/storeroom/73167723/N/957440564 (дата обращения: 20.02.2019).
Васильев М.В. Информационные войны Первой мировой. 1914–1918. URL: https://www. simvolika.org/vv060.htm (дата обращения: 20.02.2019).
Гайдар Е. Т. Собр. соч.: в 15 т. Т. 8. М.: Издательский дом «Дело» РАНХиГС, 2014. 768 с.
Дети — символы жестокости сирийской войны. Реальной и информационной // BFM.ru. 2017. 8 янв. URL: https://www.bfm.ru/news/343294 (дата обращения: 20.02.2019).
Докучаев Д.С. «Дочки-матери»: женские аллегории этнорегионов России в постсовет- ской монументальной риторике // Лабиринт: журнал социально-гуманитарных исследований. 2015. No 4. С.82–95.
Дончане обращаются к Матери-России: «Мать, не оставь нас в беде! Заступись и помо- ги!». URL: http://marina-yudenich.livejournal.com/feed (дата обращения: 20.02.2019).
Завершинский К.Ф. Символические структуры политической легитимации: дис. ... д-ра полит. наук. СПб., 2003. 314 c. URL: http://www.dissercat.com/content/simvolicheskie-struktury- politicheskoi-legitimatsii (дата обращения: 20.02.2019).
Кара-Мурза С. Г. Государственный патернализм — цивилизационное измерение // Науч- ный эксперт. 2009. No 12. С.16–24.
Кон И. Этнография детства: историографический очерк // Этнография детства. Традици- онные формы воспитания детей и подростков у народов Восточной и Юго-Восточной Азии / под ред. И.С.Кона. М.: Наука, 1983. С.9–50.
Лимонов Э. Мать не должна бросать своих детей без помощи! 2016. URL: http://limonov- eduard.livejournal.com/464221.html (дата обращения: 20.02.2019).
Малинова О.Ю. Конструирование макрополитической идентичности в постсоветской России: символическая политика в трансформирующейся публичной сфере // Политическая экспертиза: ПОЛИТЭКС. 2010. No 1. С.5–29.
Мид М. Культура и мир детства. М.: Наука, 1988. 429 с.
Немцы о русских: cб. cт. / сост. В. В. Дробышев. М.: Столица, 1995. 190 с.
Носков В.Ю. Образ ребенка-жертвы в советской пропаганде периода Великой Отече-
ственной войны (по материалам сообщений Cовинформбюро) // Журнал исторических, по- литологических и международных исследований. 2018. No 1 (64). С.7–17.
Рябов О.В. Мать и мачеха: материнский символ России в легитимации присоеди- нения Крыма к Российской Федерации // Женщина в российском обществе. 2014. No 4. С. 40–50.
Рябов О. «Россия-Матушка»: национализм, гендер и война в России XX века. Штутгарт; Ганновер: Ibidem, 2007. 290 с.
Рябов О. В. Нация и гендер в визуальных репрезентациях военной пропаганды // Женщи- на в российском обществе. 2005. No 3–4. С. 19–28.
Рябова Т.Б. Гендерные стереотипы в политической сфере современного российского общества: социологический анализ: дис. ... д-ра соц. наук. Нижегородский государственный университет им. Н.И.Лобачевского. Иваново, 2009. 385 с.
Рябова Т. Б., Рябов О. В. «Гейропа»: Гендерное измерение образа Европы в практиках по- литической мобилизации // Женщина в российском обществе. 2013. No 3. С. 31–39.
Сорока Е. День Республики: «Россия — Родина-мать» в исполнении Главы ДНР прозвуча- ла в центре Донецка // Комсомольская правда. 2019. 11 мая. URL: https://www.donetsk.kp.ru/ online/news/3472499/ (дата обращения: 11.05.2019).
Сундиев И.Ю. Под маской революции: технологии социальной деструкции в геополити- ческой борьбе за будущее // Свободная мысль. 2018. No 2 (1668). С. 53–64.
Фотофакт. В Донецке появились билборды «Мать-Украина! Береги Донбасс, как сына!» // Сегодня. 2014. 11 апр. URL: http://www.segodnya.ua/politics/society/v-donek-ke-poyavilis- bilbordy-mat-ukraina-beregi-donbass-kak-syna-512079.html (дата обращения: 20.02.2019).
Щеглова С.Н. Детство как социальный феномен (концепция социального конструирова- ния детства): дис. ... д-ра соц. наук. М., 1999. 318 с.
Barski L. Ostroznie // Mucha. 1917. No 26. S. 1.
Barlett E. Exploitation of children in propaganda war against Syria continues // Russia today. 2017. 19 January. URL: https://www.rt.com/op-ed/392976-exploitation-children-propaganda-syr- ia/ (дата обращения: 20.02.2019).
Basta K. Imagined Institutions: The Symbolic Power of Formal Rules in Bosnia and Herze- govina // Slavic Review. 2016. Vol.75, no. 4. P.944–969. URL: https://doi.org/10.5612/slavicre- view.75.4.0944 (дата обращения: 20.02.2019).
Beetham D. Legitimation of Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. 336 p.
Cohen A. The Symbolic Construction of Community. London: Routledge, 1985. 128 p. Christien A. The Representation of Youth in the Islamic State’s Propaganda Magazine Dabiq
// Journal of Terrorism Research. 2016. Vol. 7, no. 3. P. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15664/jtr.1201 (дата обращения: 20.02.2019).
Daddy, what did YOU do in the Great War? URL: https://www.bl.uk/collection-items/daddy- what-did-you-do-in-great-war (дата обращения: 20.02.2019).
Dallek R. The American Style of Foreign Policy: Cultural Politics and Foreign Affairs. New York: Alfred A.Knopf, 1983. 313 p.
Elgenius G. Symbols of Nations and Nationalism: Celebrating Nationhood. Basingstoke: Pal- grave Macmillan, 2011. 248 p.
Eriksen E. O. Symbols, Stratagems, and Legitimacy in Political Analysis // Scandinavian Political Studies. 1987. Vol.10, no. 4. P.259–278.
DeZalia R. A. P., Moeschberger S. L. The Function of Symbols that Bind and Divide // Symbols that bind, symbols that divide the semiotics of peace and conflict / eds R. A. P. DeZalia, S. L. Moesch- berger. New York: Springer, Cham, 2014. P. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05464-3_1
Goldstein J.S. War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 523 p.
Hall S. The Spectacle of the “Other” // Representation: Cultural Representations and Signify- ing Practices / ed. S.Hall. London: Thousand Oaks; New Delhi: Sage Publications, 1997. P.223– 290.
Hall S. The West and the Rest: Discourse and Power // Formations of Modernity / eds S.Hall, B.Gieben. Cambridge, UK: Open University, Polity Press, 1992. P.275–281.
Jahoda G. Images of Savages : Ancient Roots of Modern Prejudice in Western Culture. London: Routledge, 1999. 320 p.
Kantorowicz E.H. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in National Political Theology. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1957. 568 p.
Keen S. Faces of the Enemy: Reflections of the Hostile Imagination. San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1986. 199 р.
Kowalewski D. The protest uses of symbolic politics in the USSR // The Journal of Politics. 1980. Vol.42, no. 2. P.439–460. https://doi.org/10.2307/2130468.
Landsman G.H. The “Other” as Political Symbol: Images of Indians in the Woman Suffrage Movement // Ethnohistory. 1992. Vol.39, no. 3. P.247–284.
Lauenstein O., Murer J. S., Boos M., Reicher S. “Oh motherland I pledge to thee...”: a study into nationalism, gender and the representation of an imagined family within national anthems // Nations and nationalism. 2015. Vol.21, no. 2. P.309–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12123.
Mazepus H., Veenendaal W., McCarthy-Jones A., Trak Vásquez J.M. A comparative study of legitimation strategies in hybrid regimes // Policy Studies. 2015. Vol.37, no. 4. P.350–369. https:// doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2016.1157855.
Neumann I.B. Constructing Europe: Russia as Europe’s Other // Political symbols, symbolic politics / ed. U.Hedetoft. Ashgate: Aldershot, 1998. P.226–266.
Nieguth T., Raney T. Nation-building and Canada’s National Symbolic Order, 1993–2015 // Na- tions and Nationalism. 2017. Vol.23, no. 1. P.89–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12170.
Quéma A. Power and Legitimacy: Law, Culture, and Literature. University of Toronto Press, 2015. 376 p.
Richardson W. Anecdotes of the Russian Empire // Seven Britons in Imperial Russia, 1698– 1812 / ed. P.Putnam. Princeton, 1952. P.235–249.
Said E. W. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978. 368 p.
Sharp J. P. Condensing the Cold War: Reader’s Digest and American Identity. University of Min- nesota Press, 2000. 207 p. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310020209.
Tickner J.A. Gendering World Politics: Issues and Approaches in the Post-Cold War Era. New York: Columbia University Press, 2001. 272 p.
Trager O. Gorbachev’s Glasnost: Red Star Rising. New York: Facts on File Inc., 1989. 215 p.
Warren J. Are images of dead Syrian children “propaganda”? // Vanity Fair. 2017. April 13. URL: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/04/syrian-chemical-weapons-propaganda (дата обраще- ния: 20.02.2019).
Verdery K. From Parent-State to Family Patriarchs: Gender and Nation in Contemporary Eastern Europe // East European Politics and Societies. 1994. Vol.8, no. 2. Spring. P.250–255.
Yuval-Davis N. Gender and Nation. London: Thousand Oaks, 1997. 168 p.
References
Aries F. Child and family life in the old order. Ekaterinburg, Publishing House of the Ural University, 1999. 415 p. (In Russian)
Berger P.L., Luckmann T. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Moscow, Medium Publ., 1995. 323 p. (In Russian)
Brezhnev L. I. To participants of World Congress devoted to International Women’s Day. Brezh- nev L.I.Leninskim kursom: rechi i stat’i. In 5 vols. Vol.5. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1976, pp.379– 381. (In Russian)
Bugro V. The Motherland. Available at: https://gallerix.ru/storeroom/73167723/N/957440564/ (accessed: 20.02.2019). (In Russian)
Vasil’ev M.V. Information warfare in the World War I.Available at: https://www.simvolika.org/ vv060.htm (accessed: 20.02.2019). (In Russian)
Gaidar E. T. Selected Works. In 15 vol. Vol. 8. Moscow, Delo Publ., 2014. 768 p. (In Russian)
Children are symbols of cruel Syrian war. Real war and information warfare. BFM.ru. 2017. 8 January. Available at: https://www.bfm.ru/news/343294 (accessed: 20.02.2019). (In Russian)
Dokuchaev D.S. “Daughters and mothers”: Female allegories of ethnical regions of Russia in post-Soviet monumental rhetoric. Labirint: zhurnal sotsial’no-gumanitarnykh issledovanii, 2015, no. 4, pp. 82–95. (In Russian)
Donetsk inhabitants turn to Mother Russia: “Mother! Do not leave us behind! Stand up for us and help!” Available at: http://marina-yudenich.livejournal.com/feed (accessed: 20.02.2019). (In Russian)
Zavershinskii K. F. Symbolic structures of political legitimation. Dr. Sci. Thesis (Political Science). 314 p. Available at: http://www.dissercat.com/content/simvolicheskie-struktury-politicheskoi-legit- imatsii (accessed: 20.02.2019). (In Russian)
Kara-Murza S. G. State paternalism — civilizational dimension. Nauchnyi ekspert, 2009, no. 12, pp. 16–24. (In Russian)
Kon I. S. Ethnography of childhood: historical profile. Traditional Forms of Socialization of Chil- dren and Adolescents among Peoples of Central and South Asia. Ed. by I. S. Kon. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1983, pp.9–50. (In Russian)
Limonov E. A Mother must not leave her children. 2016. Available at: http://limonov-eduard. livejournal.com/464221.html (accessed: 20.02.2019). (In Russian)
Malinova O. Iu. Constructing macropolitical identity in Soviet Russia: symbolic politics in trans- forming public space. Politicheskaia ekspertiza: POLITEKS, 2010, no. 1, pp. 5–29. (In Russian) Mead M. Culture and World of childhood. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988. 429 p. (In Russian)
Germans about Russians. Ed. V.V.Drobyshev. Moscow, Stolitsa Publ., 1995. 190 p. (In Rus- sian)
Noskov V.Iu. Image of child as a victim in Soviet propaganda of Great Patriotic war period (on the messages of Sovinformburo). Zhurnal istoricheskikh, politologicheskikh i mezhdunarodnykh issledovanii, 2018, no. 1 (64), pp. 7–17. (In Russian)
Riabov O.V. The mother and the step-mother: maternal symbol of Russia in legitimation of Crimea joining the Russian Federation. Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve, 2014, no. 4, pp. 40– 50. (In Russian)
Riabov O.V. “Mother Russia”: Nationalism, gender, and war in XX century Russia. Stuttgart, Hannover, Ibidem, 2007. 290 p. (In Russian)
Riabov O.V. Nation and gender in visual representations of war propaganda. Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve, 2005, no. 3–4, pp. 19–28. (In Russian)
Riabova T. B. Gender stereotypes in political space of contemporary Russian society: sociologi- cal analysis. Dr. Sci. Thesis (Sociology). Ivanovo, 2009. 385 p. (In Russian)
Riabova T., Riabov O. V. “Gayropa”: gender dimension of image of Europe in the practices of political mobilization. Zhenshchina v rossiiskom obshchestve, 2013, no. 3, pp. 31–39. (In Rus- sian)
Soroka E. Day of the Republic: the song “Russia as Mother Russia” was performed by the Head of DNR in the center of Donetsk. Komsomolskaia pravda. 2019. 11 May. Available at: https://www. donetsk.kp.ru/online/news/3472499/ (accessed: 11.05.2019). (In Russian)
Sundiev I. Iu. Under mask of revolution: technologies of social destruction in geopolitical strug- gle for future. Svobodnaia Mysl’, 2018, no. 2 (1668), pp. 53–64. (In Russian)
In Donetsk the billboards “Mother Ukraine! Take care Donbass as a son” have appeared. Segodnya. 2014. April 11. Available at: http://www.segodnya.ua/politics/society/v-donek-ke- poyavilis-bilbordy-mat-ukraina-beregi-donbass-kak-syna-512079.html (accessed: 20.02.2019). (In Russian)
Shcheglova S.N. Childhood as social phenomenon (theory of social constructing childhood). Dr. Sci. Thesis (Sociology). Moscow, 1999. 318 p. (In Russian)
Barski L. Ostroznie. Mucha, 1917, no. 26, s. 1.
Barlett E. Exploitation of children in propaganda war against Syria continues. Russia today. 2017. 19 January. Available at: https://www.rt.com/op-ed/392976-exploitation-children-propagan- da-syria/ (accessed: 20.02.2019).
Basta K. Imagined Institutions: The Symbolic Power of Formal Rules in Bosnia and Herzego- vina. Slavic Review, 2016, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 944–969. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5612/slavicre- view.75.4.0944 (accessed: 20.02.2019).
Beetham D. Legitimation of Power. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. 336 p.
Cohen A. The Symbolic Construction of Community. London, Routledge, 1985. 128 p. Christien A. The Representation of Youth in the Islamic State’s Propaganda Magazine Dabiq.
Journal of Terrorism Research, 2016, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1–8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15664/ jtr.1201 (accessed: 20.02.2019).
Daddy, what did YOU do in the Great War? Available at: https://www.bl.uk/collection-items/ daddy-what-did-you-do-in-great-war (accessed: 20.02.2019).
Dallek R. The American Style of Foreign Policy: Cultural Politics and Foreign Affairs. New York, Alfred A.Knopf, 1983. 313 p.
Elgenius G. Symbols of Nations and Nationalism: Celebrating Nationhood. Basingstoke, Pal- grave Macmillan, 2011. 248 p.
Eriksen E.O. Symbols, Stratagems, and Legitimacy in Political Analysis. Scandinavian Political Studies, 1987, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 259–278.
DeZalia R.A.P., Moeschberger S.L. The Function of Symbols that Bind and Divide. Symbols that bind, symbols that divide the semiotics of peace and conflict. Eds R.A.P.DeZalia, S.L.Moe- schberger. New York, Springer, Cham, 2014, pp. 1–12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3- 319-05464-3_1 (accessed: 20.02.2019).
Goldstein J.S. War and Gender: How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 523 p.
Hall S. The Spectacle of the “Other”. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Ed. S. Hall. London, Thousand Oaks; New Delhi, Sage Publications, 1997, pp. 223–290. Hall S. The West and the Rest: Discourse and Power. Formations of Modernity. Eds S.Hall,
B. Gieben. Cambridge, UK, Open University Polity Press, 1992, pp. 275–281.
Jahoda G. Images of Savages: Ancient Roots of Modern Prejudice in Western Culture. London,
Routledge, 1999. 320 p.
Kantorowicz E. H. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in National Political Theology. Princeton, N. J.,
Princeton University Press, 1957. 568 p.
Keen S. Faces of the Enemy: Reflections of the Hostile Imagination. San Francisco, Harper &
Row, 1986. 199 р.
Kowalewski D. The protest uses of symbolic politics in the USSR. The Journal of Politics, 1980,
vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 439–460. https://doi.org/10.2307/2130468.
Landsman G.H. The “Other” as Political Symbol: Images of Indians in the Woman Suffrage
Movement. Ethnohistory, 1992, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 247–284.
Lauenstein O., Murer J. S., Boos M., Reicher S. “Oh motherland I pledge to thee...”: a study into
nationalism, gender and the representation of an imagined family within national anthems. Nations and nationalism, 2015, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12123.
Mazepus H., Veenendaal W., McCarthy-Jones A., Trak Vásquez J.M. A comparative study of legitimation strategies in hybrid regimes. Policy Studies, 2015, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 350–369. https:// doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2016.1157855.
Neumann I. B. Constructing Europe: Russia as Europe’s Other. Political symbols, symbolic poli- tics. Ed. U. Hedetoft. Ashgate, Aldershot, 1998, pp. 226–266.
Nieguth T., Raney T. Nation-building and Canada’s National Symbolic Order, 1993–2015. Na- tions and Nationalism, 2017, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 89–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12170.
Quéma A. Power and Legitimacy: Law, Culture, and Literature. Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 2015. 376 p.
Richardson W. Anecdotes of the Russian Empire. Seven Britons in Imperial Russia, 1698–1812. Ed. P.Putnam. Princeton, 1952, pp. 235–249.
Said E. W. Orientalism. New York, Pantheon Books, 1978. 368 p.
Sharp J. P. Condensing the Cold War: Reader’s Digest and American Identity. Minneapolis, Uni- versity of Minnesota Press, 2000. 207 p. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310020209
Tickner J.A. Gendering World Politics: Issues and Approaches in the Post-Cold War Era. New York, Columbia University Press, 2001. 272 p.
Trager O. Gorbachev’s Glasnost: Red Star Rising. New York, Facts on File Inc., 1989. 215 p.
Warren J. Are images of dead Syrian children “propaganda”? Vanity Fair. 2017. April 13. Avail- able at: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/04/syrian-chemical-weapons-propaganda (ac- cessed: 20.02.2019).
Verdery K. From Parent-State to Family Patriarchs: Gender and Nation in Contemporary Eastern Europe. East European Politics and Societies, 1994, vol. 8, no. 2, Spring, pp. 250–255.
Yuval-Davis N. Gender and Nation. London, Thousand Oaks, 1997. 168 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles of "Political Expertise: POLITEX" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
