Editorial Ethics

General guidelines

Publishing ethics policy of the Journal is the code of conduct and guidelines which should be followed by all participants of the academic publication process, including authors, peer reviewers, editors, publishers, distributors, and readers.

The Editorial Board abides by the copyright law and anti-plagiarism regulations of the Russian Federation as well as the set of the ethical principles shared by the community of academic publishers; Editorial Board is responsible for publishing and disseminating manuscripts.

Publishing ethics policy of Political Expertise: POLITEX follows the guidelines designed by the international Committee on Publication Ethics (СОРЕ).

The editorial board and all persons who have a direct or indirect relation to the formation and publication of the journal, including authors, reviewers, editors, publishers, distributors and readers, must follow the ethical, scientific and publishing standards of the international scientific community. The scientific and ethical standards adopted by the editorial board cannot be changed in order to serve commercial or business interests.


The editor-in-chief, editorial board, authors and reviewers of the journal are guided by the following ethical guidelines:

  • Scientific objectivity and impartiality in the selection of research to be published.
    The decision regarding the acceptance or rejection of articles occurs solely on the basis of relevance, scientific significance, the originality of the submitted materials, as well as their compliance with the outlined requirements and the specificity of the subject area. Discrimination of authors based on race, nationality, culture, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, citizenship, social status or political opinion is inadmissible. The editorial board guarantees the possibility of publishing materials that reflect different scientific- and socio-political views.

  • Competence and integrity during the scientific review and the preparation for publication.
    All materials that are being considered for publication undergo a mandatory check for plagiarism, in addition to a double-blind peer review. Articles containing insults, slander and ad-hominem attacks are rejected without review. If the editorial board has sufficient grounds to believe that the submission is not the result of independent work conducted by the author(s), it is likewise rejected.

  • Confidentiality.
    Scientific ideas and materials presented in submissions that are either being considered for publication or have been rejected after a review cannot be used in the work of the members of the editorial board or third parties without the written permission of the authors. Confidential information obtained over the course of the review cannot be disclosed and used for personal gain.

  • Collegiality and mutual respect.
    All members of the editorial board participate in the formation of the content of the scientific publication on equal terms and bear equal responsibility for the quality of the published materials. The editorial board must consistently strive to prevent conflicts between academic and personal interests in the decision-making process regarding the publication of materials, resolving possible conflict situations on the basis of the charter of the journal and existing legislation.

  • Transparency and responsibility.
    All members of the editorial board maintain close and open cooperation with the authors, reviewers and readers of the journal, and are ready to acknowledge mistakes made during the publication of the materials and, if necessary, publish corrections, clarifications, errata and apologies in order to ensure the continuous improvement of the journal and enhance its reputation in the scientific community. The editorial board, together with the publisher, are obliged not to leave concerns regarding the examined manuscripts or published materials unanswered. In cases of conflict, all necessary measures are taken to address any infringements of the rights of the author.


The editor-in-chief bears responsibility for:

  • Managing the review process and communication with the authors — as well as members of the editorial board — in order to facilitate the publication of the journal on a quarterly basis.

  • The final decision on the publication of the received material, taking into account the opinions of reviewers and members of the editorial board.

  • Providing the documents pertaining to the preparation of the article for publication (reviews, protocols of editorial board meetings, etc.) — which are stored for at least five years from the date of receipt at the editorial office — upon request from the publisher, founder or other authorized third parties (including representatives of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation).


Reviewers are responsible for:

  • The scientific accuracy and independence of the conducted review. The evaluation of peer-reviewed materials should be objective and supported by sound arguments. Subjective ad-hominem attacks on the author are unacceptable.

  • The review is carried out taking into account the current state of philosophical and conflictological research and the diversity of existing points of view on the issues discussed in the article.

  • Materials received for review cannot be used by the reviewer for personal purposes or transferred to third parties. The reviewer has the right to decline to participate and notify the editor-in-chief about any conflicts of interest.


Authors who submit materials for publication to the journal are responsible for:

  • The scientific validity, novelty, sound theoretical reasoning and ethical propriety of the conducted research. Articles and other materials proposed for publication must be original, that is, previously unpublished.

  • All external provisions and statements by other persons used in the materials must be formatted in accordance with copyright and citation requirements.

  • The articles written in co-authorship should reflect the contribution of all persons who participated in the work and influenced its course. Co-authors of publications cannot be persons who have provided only technical, consulting, organizational, moral or material support.

  • If errors or inaccuracies are found at the material review stage, the author must immediately notify the editorial board of the journal of their presence.

The editorial board and the publishing house have the right to reject any materials that violate the above principles.