PUBLIC POLICY AND CIVIL SOCIETY

CASE OF SAINT PETERSBURG

Authors

  • Larisa Nikovskaya Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), RANEPA
  • Vladimir Yakimets RANEPA, Institute for Information Transmission Problems

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2018.105

Abstract

Problematic issues of public policy and civil society in a large metropolis are considered within the public sphere context in the country as a whole based on findings of empirical sociological surveys conducted in 2009-2011 in several Russian regions. Improve the openness and trans- parency of public administration in modern Russia requires effective use of feedback tools, which allow the authorities to catch the trends of development of social processes and to make correction of managerial decisions, and the public to influence the formation of the “agenda” and the process of making management decisions, to participate in the solution of socially important problems and to monitor the quality of their solution. Civil society is increasingly maturing a request for a well-functioning institutions interaction. If we approach the analysis of multilateral and contradictory processes of socio-political transformation in Russia from the perspective of the interests of civil society actors, we can definitely say that in the current environment it demonstrates the trend of transition from the factor of socio-political modernisation to become one of its subjects. In the process of its development, it begins to act as a kind of “indicator” quality of the institutional environment of the political system, showing how deeply and organically it presents democratic beginning. It is very important to be able to empirically identify the quality of the public institutions of this interaction. In order to compare the effectiveness of different institutions of public policy, we have proposed a new criterion, the viability of the institutions of public policy. Analysis of the functional effectiveness of public policy institutes is given. “Weaknesses” of important mechanisms of interaction of the local government and civil society in a public field in St. Petersburg are revealed.

Keywords:

public policy, index, the effectiveness of institutions, local government, civil society, interaction

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Никовская Л.И., Якимец В.Н. Типология публичной политики в российских регионах // СОЦИС (Социологические исследования). 2011а, No 3. С. 56–66.

Никовская Л.И., Якимец В.Н. Публичная политика в регионах России: типы, субъекты, институты и современные вызовы // ПОЛИС (Политические исследования). 2011б, No 1. С. 80–92.

Никовская Л.И., Якимец В.Н. Оценка действенности институтов публичной политики в России // ПОЛИС (Политические исследования). 2013, No 5. С. 77–86.

Никовская Л.И., Якимец В.Н. Публичная политика в регионах России: концептуальные основания и инструментальные методы // Российская политическая наука: идеи, концепции, методы / под ред. Л.В.Сморгунова. М.: Аспект-Пресс, 2015. С.345–370.

Никовская Л. И., Скалабан И. А. Гражданское участие: особенности дискурса и тенденции реального развития // ПОЛИС. Политические исследования. 2017, No 6. С. 43–60.

Якимец В.Н., Никовская Л.И., Курзанова Д.С. Антирейтинг институтов и механизмов пу- бличной политики // Государственное управление в XXI веке: традиции и инновации: мат-лы 10-й междунар. конф. М.: Изд-во МГУ им. М.В.Ломоносова, 2012. Ч.I.С.130–139.

Якимец В.Н. Индекс для оценки и мониторинга публичной политики // Публичное про- странство, гражданское общество и власть: опыт развития и взаимодействия. М.: РАПН; РОССПЭН, 2008. С.107–121.

Риттер М. Публичная сфера как идеал политической культуры // Граждане и власть: про- блемы и подходы / под ред. Г. М. Михалевой, С. И. Рыженкова. СПб.: Летний сад, 2001. С. 30–67. Указ Президента РФ от 14 ноября 2017 г. No 548 «Об оценке эффективности деятельности органов исполнительной власти субъектов Российской Федерации». URL: http://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/ 71709662/ (дата обращения: 22.05.2018).

Путин В.В. Послание Президента Федеральному Собранию Российской Федерации.

12.12.2012. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_138990/ (дата обращения: 20.03.2018).

Путин В.В. Послание Президента Федеральному Собранию Российской Федерации 01.03.2018 // Официальные сетевые ресурсы Президента России. URL: http://kremlin.ru/ events/president/news/56957/work (дата обращения: 20.03.2018).

Lasswell H. D. Psychopathology and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1930. 285 p.

References

Lasswell H. D. Psychopathology and Politics. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1930, 285 p.

Nikovskaya L.I., Skalaban I.A. Grazhdanskoe uchastie: osobennosti diskursa i tendentsii real’nogo razvitiia [Civic participation: features of discourse and trends of real development]. POLIS (Politicheskie issledovaniia) [Polis (Political studies)], 2017, no. 6, pp. 43–60. (In Russian)

Nikovskaya L. I., Yakimets V. N. Otsenka deistvennosti institutov publichnoi politiki v Rossii [Eval- uation of the effectiveness of public policy institutions in Russia]. POLIS (Politicheskie issledovaniia) [Polis (Political studies)], 2013, no, pp.77–86. (In Russian)

Nikovskaya L. I., Yakimets V. N. Publichnaia politika v regionakh Rossii: kontseptual’nye osnova- niia i instrumental’nye metody [Public policy in Russian regions: conceptual basics and instrumental methods]. Rossiiskaia politicheskaia nauka: idei, kontseptsii, metody [Russian political science: ideas, concepts, methods: scientific publication]. Ed. by L.V.Smorgunov. Moscow, Aspect-Press, 2015, pp. 345–370. (In Russian)

Nikovskaya L.I., Yakimets V.N. Publinchaia politika v regionakh Rossii: tipy, sub”ekty, institu- ty i sovremennye vyzovy [Public policy in Russian regions: types, actors, institutions and modern challenges]. POLIS (Politicheskie issledovaniia) [Polis (Political studies)], 2011b, no. 1, pp. 80–92. (In Russian)

Nikovskaya L.I., Yakimets V.N. Tipologiia publichnoi politiki v rossiiskikh regionakh [Typology of public policy in Russian regions]. SOTsIS (Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia) [SOCIS (Sociological studies)], 2011а, no. 3, pp. 56–66. (In Russian)

Putin V. V. Poslanie Prezidenta Federal’nomu Sobraniiu Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 12.12.2012. [Pres- ident’s Address To The Federal Assembly Of The Russian Federation]. 12.12.2012. Available at: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_138990/ (accessed: 20.03.2018). (In Russian)

Putin V.V. Poslanie Prezidenta Federal’nomu Sobraniiu Rossiiskoi Federatsii [President’s Ad- dress To The Federal Assembly Of The Russian Federation]. 01.03.2018. Ofitsial’nye setevye resursy Prezidenta Rossii [Official Internet Resources of the President of Russia]. Available at: http://krem- lin.ru/events/president/news/56957/work (accessed: 20.03.2018). (In Russian)

Ritter M. Publichnaia sfera kak ideal politicheskoi kul’tury [Public sphere as an ideal of political culture]. Grazhdane i vlast’: problemy i podkhody [Citizens and power: Problems and approaches]. Ed. by G. M. Mikhaleva, S. I. Ryzhenkova. St. Petersburg, Summer garden, 2001, pp. 30–67. (In Rus- sian)

Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 14 noiabria 2017 g. No 548 «Ob otsenke effektivnosti deiatel’nosti or- ganov ispolnitel’noi vlasti sub”ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii» [The decree of the President of the Rus- sian Federation from November 14, 2017 No. 548 “About the estimation of efficiency of activity of Executive authorities of constituent entities of the Russian Federation]. Available at: http://www. garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71709662/ (accessed: 22.05.2018). (In Russian)

Yakimets V. N. Indeks dlia otsenki i monitoringa publichnoi politiki [Index for evaluating and mon- itoring of public policy]. Publichnoe prostranstvo, grazhdanskoe obshchestvo i vlast’: opyt razvitiia i vzaimodeistviia [Public space, civil society and power: experiences of development and interac- tion]. Moscow, RPSA, ROSSPEN, 2008, pp. 107–121. (In Russian)

Yakimets V.N., Nikovskaya L.I., Kurzanova D.S. Antireiting institutov i mekhanizmov publichnoi politiki [Anti-rating of institutions and mechanisms of public policy]. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie v XXI veke: traditsii i innovatsii: mat-ly 10-i mezhdunar. konf. [Public administration in the 21st cen- tury: traditions and innovations. Proceedings of the 10th international conference]. Moscow, MGU named after M.V.Lomonosov Publ., 2012, part I, pp. 130–139. (In Russian)

Published

2022-02-06

How to Cite

Nikovskaya, L. ., & Yakimets, V. (2022). PUBLIC POLICY AND CIVIL SOCIETY: CASE OF SAINT PETERSBURG. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 14(1), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2018.105

Issue

Section

Political processes and technologies