Three narratives of political science: perspectives of interdisciplinary political studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu23.2019.202Abstract
Modern political science faces significant challenges in methodology, positioning, and disciplinary reproduction. Virtually all of these challenges (both internalist and externalist) are due to the reduction of the methodology of political science to the positivist paradigm. Examples of concepts of political culture, democratic transit, hybrid regimes, post-secularity, political will are a demonstration of the positivist paradigm weaknesses. The positivist methodological orientation dominance gives such the cost in political science as both in the reduction of the scientific explanation to the evaluative categorization and in the elimination from the subject of consideration of the actual political subject and his will. Answers to these challenges suggest systematization of the interdisciplinary narrative of political knowledge. It is necessary to expand the methodological horizon of the analysis of political reality. Such expansion is possible on the interdisciplinary approach basis, which is specified in this work as fixing and disclosing the poly-narrative content of political knowledge. The dynamics of political reality is revealed through the procedure (algorithm, technology) of the generation of a phenomenon or concept with the help of narratives, the corresponding formulation of factology, theoretical constructs and the goals of political reality analysis. In turn, the history of the generation procedure, taking into account the social forces game reveal the individual nature of political phenomena. In this regard, it becomes clear that the key role for modern political science is precisely the validity of the goals pursued, problem orientation, i. e. “expediency” of the planned or carried out the activity. The criterion of science is not in the methods, but in solving the problem, which is guaranteed by the adequacy of the methods used. The proposed approach opens up new possibilities for analyzing and explaining the political processes dynamics, the role of specific political forces, socio-cultural and personal factors in them.
Keywords:
constructivism, interdisciplinarity, narratives, positivism, political science
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Литература
Анкерсмит Ф. Р. Эстетическая политика. Политическая философия по ту сторону факта и ценности / пер. с англ. Д. Кралечкина; под науч. ред. И. Борисовой. М.: ВШЭ, 2014. 432 с.
Аристотель. Никомахова этика // Аристотель. Собр. соч.: в 4 т. М.: Мысль, 1983. Т. 4. С. 53–94.
Брубейкер Р. Этничность без групп. М.: ВШЭ, 2012. 408 с.
Герасимов С. В., Тульчинский Г. Л. События как семантическая основа конструирования реальности: перспективы перехода к динамической онтологии // Слово.ru: Балтийский акцент. 2018. Т. 9, № 3. C. 5–24.
Даймонд Л. Прошла ли третья волна демократизации // Полис. Политические исследования. 1993. № 2. С. 34–43.
Дискуссия о профессионализме в политике и политической науке. URL: http://www.rapn.ru/in.php?part=1&gr=1623 (дата обращения: 09.12.2018).
Замминистра образования Игорь Федюкин: Многие российские диссертации не выдерживают критики. URL: http://www.snob.ru/selected/entry/56786 (дата обращения: 30.11.2018).
Ильин М. В. Слова и смыслы. Опыт описания основных политических понятий. М.: РОС-СПЭН, 1997. 432 с.
Кламер А. Странная наука экономика. Приглашение к разговору. М.; СПб.: Ин-т Гайдара, 2015. 336 с.
Конышев В. Н., Сергунин А. А. Теория международных отношений: канун новых «великих дебатов»? // Полис. Политические исследования. 2013. № 2. С. 66–78.
Кордонский С. Г. Россия: поместная федерация. М.: Европа, 2010. 312 c.
Кордонский С. Г. Рынки власти: Административные рынки СССР и России. М.: ОГИ, 2006. 240 c.
Кузнецов И. И. Парадигма транзитологии (плюсы и минусы объяснительной концепции переходного периода) // Общественные науки и современность. 2000. № 5. С. 46–51.
Кун Т. Структура научных революций. М.: Прогресс, 1977. 300 с.
Ладенко И. С., Тульчинский Г. Л. Логика целевого управления. Новосибирск: Наука, 1988. 208 с.
Макклоски Д. Риторика экономической науки. М.; СПб.: Ин-т Гайдара, 2015. 328 с.
Малинова О. Ю. Символическая политика: Контуры проблемного поля // Символическая политика. М.: ИНИОН, 2012. Вып. 1. С. 5–17.
Меркель В., Круассан А. Формальные и неформальные институты в дефектных демократиях (I) // Полис. Политические исследования. 2002. № 1. С. 7–15.
Норт Д. Институты, институциональные изменения и функционирование экономики. М.: Фонд эконом. книги «Начала», 1997. 185 с.
Норт Д. Понимание процесса экономических изменений. М.: ВШЭ, 2010. 256 с.
Норт Д., Уоллис Д., Вайнгаст Б. Насилие и социальные порядки: Концептуальные рамки для интерпретации письменной истории человечества / пер. с англ. Д. Узланера, М. Маркова, Д. Раскова, А. Расковой. М.: Ин-т Гайдара, 2011. 480 с.
Павловский Г. Система РФ. Источники российского стратегического поведения: метод G. F. Kennan. М.: Европа, 2015. 152 с.
Пайпс Р. Собственность и свобода. М.: Моск. школа политичекских исследований, 2000. 415 с.
Петренко В. Ф. Конструктивизм как методология множественности модельного описания и конструирования в познании // Гуманитарные основания социального прогресса: Россия и современность. М.: МГУДТ, 2016. Ч. 1. С. 221–229.
Полани М. Личностное знание. М.: Прогресс, 1977. 300 с.
Поппер К. Открытое общество и его враги. М.: Феникс, 1992. Т. 1–2. 448 с.
Саква Р. Режимная система и гражданское общество в России // Полис. Политические исследования. 1997. № 1. С. 76–80.
Сунгуров А. Функции политической системы: от застоя к постперестройке. СПб.: СПб Центр «Стратегия», 1998. 300 с.
Тулмин С. Концептуальные революции в науке // Структура и развитие науки. Из бостонских исследований по философии науки. М.: Прогресс, 1978. С. 170–189.
Тульчинский Г. Л. Идеи: источники, динамика и логическое содержание // История идей как методология гуманитарных исследований. СПб.: Центр истории идей, 2001. С. 28–58.
Тульчинский Г. Л. Информационные войны как политическая технология и метод анализа // Российский политический процесс в региональном измерении: история, теория, практика. Барнаул: Си-пресс, 2015. С. 187–192.
Тульчинский Г. Л. Объяснение в политической науке: конструктивизм vs позитивизм // Публичная политика. 2017. № 1. С. 76–98.
Тульчинский Г. Л. Политические трансформации в России и современная политическая наука // Неприкосновенный запас. 2014a. № 98 (6/2014). С. 95–112.
Тульчинский Г. Л. Социальные технологии и знание // Философские науки. 2014b. № 10. С. 20–29.
Фейерабенд П. Наука в свободном обществе. М.: АСТ, 2010. 378 с.
Фуко М. Воля к истине: по ту сторону знания, власти и сексуальности. Работы разных лет. М.: Касталь, 1996. 448 с.
Хабермас Ю. Между натурализмом и религией. Философские статьи. М.: Весь мир, 2011. 336 с.
Хабермас Ю. Моральное сознание и коммуникативное действие. СПб.: Наука, 2000. 382 с.
Хантингтон С. Третья волна. Демократизация в конце ХХ века. М.: РОССПЭН, 2003. 368 с.
Хедлунд С. Невидимые руки, опыт России и общественная наука. Способы объяснения системного провала. М.: ВШЭ, 2015. 424 c.
Холтон Д. Тематический анализ науки. М.: Прогресс, 1981. 383 с.
Шапиро И. Бегство гуманитарных наук от реальности. М.: ВШЭ, 2011. 368 с.
Шейгал Е. И. Семиотика политического дискурса. М.: Гнозис, 2004. 326 с.
Шмиттер Ф. Размышления о «транзитологии»: раньше и теперь // Отечественные записки. 2013. № 6 (57). C. 8–25.
Alker H. R., jr. Political Methodology, Old and New // A New Handbook of Political Science / ed. by R. E. Goodin and H. D. Klingemann. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. P. 787–799.
Almond G., Verba S. The Civic Culture. Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. London, etc.: SAGE Publications, Inc, 1989. 392 p.
Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. New York: Crown Business, 2012.
Bratton M., van der Walle N. Neopatrimonial Regimes and Political Transitions in Africa // World Politics. 1994. Vol. 46, N 4. P. 453–489.
Buzan B., Waever O., Wilde J. Security: a new framework for analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publ., 1998. viii, 239 p.
Dijk Т. van. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage, 1998. 201 p.
Edelman M. Politics as symbolic action. Mass arousal and quiescence. Chicago: Markham publ. Co, 1971. 188 p.
Featherstone M. In pursuit of the postmodern: an introduction // Theory, Culture, and Society. 1988. Vol. 5, N 2–3. P. 195.
Fisun O. Rethinking Post-Soviet Politics from a Neopatrimonial Perspective // Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization. 2012. Vol. 20. N 2. P. 87–96.
Foucault M. Power / knowledge: selected interviews and writings 1972–1977. Brighton: Harvester, 1980. xi, 270 p.
Galtung J. Essays in methodology. Vol. 1: Methodology and ideology. Copenhagen: Christian Ejlers, 1977. 387 р.
Guzzini S. The concept of Power: a Constructivist Analysis // Millenium. 2005. Vol. 33, N 3. P. 495–511.
Hempel C. G. Science, Explanation, and Rationality: Aspects of the Philosophy of Carl G. Hempel. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. 342 p.
International theory: positivism and beyond / ed. by S. Smith, K. Booth, M. Zalewski. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. 163 p.
In the Shadow of Violence / ed. by D. C. North and others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Kratochwill F., Ruggie J. G. International organization: a state of the art of an art of the state // International Organization. 1986. Vol. 40, N 4. P. 753-775.
Merkel W. Embedded and Defective Democracies // Democratization. 2004. Vol. 11, N 5. P. 28–35.
O’Donnell G., Schmitter Ph. C. Defining Some Concepts (and Exposing Some Assumptions) // Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Prospects for Democracy / еd. by G. O’Donnell, Ph. C. Schmitter, L. Whitehead. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986. Vol. 4. P. 9–13.
Patomaki H. After International Relations. Critical Realism and the (Re)Construction of World Politics. London, New York: Routledge, 2002. 288 p.
Patomaki H., Wight C. After Positivism? The Promises of Critical Realism // Theory of International Relations / ed. by S. Chan, C. Moore. London: Sage Publications, 2006. Vol. IV. P. 231–245.
Reus-Smit C. Constructivism. Theories of International Relations / ed. by S. Burchill, A. Linklater, R. Devetak, M. Paterson, C. Reus-Smit, J. True. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 212 p.
Sil R., Katzenstein P. Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. New York: Palgrave, 2010. 280 p.
Tulchinskii G. Information wars as a conflict of interpretations: activating the ‘third party’ // Russian Journal of Communication. 2013. Vol. 5, N 3. P. 244–251.
References
Acemoglu D., Robinson J. A. Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. New York, Crown Business, 2012. 544 p.
Alker H. R., jr. Political Methodology, Old and New. A New Handbook of Political Science. Ed. by Robert E. Goodin and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 787–799.
Almond G., Verba S. The Civic Culture. Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. London, etc., SAGE Publications, Inc, 1989. 392 p.
Ankersmit F. R. Esteticheskaia politika. Politicheskaia filosofiia po tu storonu fakta i tsennosti [Aesthetic policy. Political philosophy on the other side of fact and value]. Trans. from eng. by D. Kralechkin; ed. by I. Borisova. Moscow, Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki publ., 2014. 432 p. (In Russian)
Aristotle. Nikomakhova etika [Nicomachean Ethics]. Aristotle, Sobranie sochinenii [Collected works], in 4 vols., vol. 4. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1983, pp. 53–94. (In Russian)
Bratton M., van der Walle N. Neopatrimonial Regimes and Political Transitions in Africa. World Politics. 1994, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 453–489.
Brubaker R. Etnichnost’ bez grupp [Ethnicity without Groups]. Moscow, Izd. dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki Publ., 2012. 408 p. (In Russian)
Buzan B., Waever O., Wilde J. Security: a new framework for analysis. London, Lynne Rienner Publ., 1998. viii, 239 p.
Diamond L. Proshla li tret’ia volna demokratizatsii [Has the third wave of democratization passed?]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, 1993, no. 2, рp. 34–43. (In Russian)
Dijk Т. van. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London, SAGE Publications, 1998. 201 p.
Diskussiia o professionalizme v politike i politicheskoi nauke [Discussion about professionalism in politics and political science]. Available at: http://www.rapn.ru/in.php?part=1&gr=1623 (accessed: 09.12.2018). (In Russian)
Edelman M. Politics as symbolic action. Mass arousal and quiescence. Chicago, Markham publ. Co, 1971. 188 p.
Featherstone M. In pursuit of the postmodern: an introduction. Theory, Culture, and Society, 1988, vol. 5, no. 2–3, p. 195.
Feyerabend P. Nauka v svobodnom obshchestve [Science in a Free Society], Мoscow, АSТ Publ., 2010. 384 p. (In Russian)
Fisun O. Rethinking Post-Soviet Politics from a Neopatrimonial Perspective. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization. 2012, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 87–96.
Foucault M. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and writings 1972–1977. Brighton, Harvester, 1980. xi, 270 p.
Foucault M. Volia k istine: po tu storonu znaniia, vlasti i seksual’nosti. Raboty raznykh let [The Will to Truth: Beyond Knowledge, Power, and Sexuality. Works of different years]. Moscow, Castal Publ., 1996. 448 p. (In Russian)
Galtung J. Essays in methodology. Vol. 1: Methodology and ideology. Copenhagen, Christian Ejlers, 1977. 387 р.
Gerasimov S. V., Tulchinskii G. L. Sobytiia kak semanticheskaia osnova konstruirovaniia real’nosti: perspektivy perekhoda k dinamicheskoi ontologii [Events as a Semantic Framework for the Construction of Reality: The Prospects of a Transition to a Dynamic Ontology]. Slovo.ru: Baltiiskii aktsent, 2018, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 5–24. (In Russian)
Guzzini S. The concept of Power: a Constructivist Analysis. Millenium, 2005, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 495–511.
Habermas J. Mezhdu naturalizmom i religiei. Filosofskie stat’i [Between Naturalism and Religion. Philosophical articles]. Moscow, Ves’ mir Publ., 2011. 336 p.(In Russian)
Habermas J. Moral’noe soznanie i kommunikativnoe deistvie [Moral consciousness and communicative action]. St. Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2000. 336 p. (In Russian)
Hantington S. Tret’ia volna. Demokratizatsiia v kontse XX veka [The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2003. 368 p. (In Russian)
Hedlund S. Nevidimye ruki, opyt Rossii i obshchestvennaia nauka. Sposoby ob”iasneniia sistemnogo provala [Invisible Hands, Russian Experience, and Social Science: Approaches to Understanding Systemic Failure]. Moscow, VShE Publ., 2015. 424 p. (In Russian)
Hempel C. G. Science, Explanation, and Rationality: Aspects of the Philosophy of Carl G. Hempel. New York, Oxford University Press, 2000. 342 p.
Holton D. Tematicheskii analiz nauki [Thematic Analysis of Science]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1981. 383 p. (In Russian)
Il’in M. V. Slova i smysly. Opyt opisaniia osnovnykh politicheskikh poniatii [Words and senses. Experience of Description of the Basic political concepts]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 1997. 432 p. (In Russian)
In the Shadow of Violence. Ed. by D. C. North and others. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2013. 376 p.
International theory: positivism and beyond. Ed. by S. Smith, K. Booth, M. Zalewski. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1996. 163 p.
Klamer A. Strannaia nauka ekonomika. Priglashenie k razgovoru [Strange science economics. Invitation to conversation]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Gaidar Institut Publ., 2015. 344 p. (In Russian)
Konyshev V. N., Sergunin A. A. Teoriia mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: kanun novykh «velikikh debatov »? [The theory of international relations: the eve of the new “great debate”?]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, 2013, no. 2, pp. 66–78. (In Russian)
Kordonskii S. G. Rynki vlasti: Administrativnye rynki SSSR i Rossii [Markets of authority: Administrative markets in USSR and Russia]. Moscow, OGI Publ., 2006. 240 p. (In Russian)
Kordonskii S. G. Rossiia: pomestnaia federatsiia [Russia: Estatic Federation]. Moscow, Evropa Publ., 2010. 312 p. (In Russian)
Kratochwill F., Ruggie J. G. International organization: a state of the art of an art of the state. International Organization, 1986, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 753–775.
Kuhn T. Struktura nauchnykh revoliutsii [The Structure of Scientific Revolutions]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1977. 300 p. (In Russian)
Kuznetsov I. I. Paradigma tranzitologii (pliusy i minusy ob”iasnitel’noi kontseptsii perekhodnogo perioda) [Transitology Paradigm (Pros and Cons of the Explanatory Concepts of the Transition Period)]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 2000, no. 5, pp. 46–51. (In Russian)
Ladenko I. S., Tulchinskii G. L. Logika tselevogo upravleniia [Logic of the Targeting Management]. Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1988. 208 p. (In Russian)
Malinova O. Iu. Simvolicheskaia politika: Kontury problemnogo polia [Symbolic politics: contours of the problem field]. Simvolicheskaia politika [Symbolic politics], is. 1. Moscow, INION Publ., 2012, pp. 5–17. (In Russian)
McCloskey D. Ritorika ekonomicheskoi nauki [Rhetoric of economics]. Moscow, St. Petersburg, Gaidar Institut Publ., 2015. 328 p.(In Russian)
Merkel W. Embedded and Defective Democracies. Democratization. 2004, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 28–35.
Merkel W., Kruassan A. Formal’nye i neformal’nye instituty v defektnykh demokratiiakh (I) [Formal and Informal Institutions in Defective Democracies (I)], Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, 2002, no. 1, pp. 7–15. (In Russian)
North D. Instituty, institutsional’nye izmeneniia i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki [Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance]. Moscow, Fond ekonom. knigi «Nachala», 1997. 185 p. (In Russian)
North D. Ponimanie protsessa ekonomicheskikh izmenenii [Understanding the Process of Economic Change]. Moscow, VShE Publ., 2010. 256 p. (In Russian)
North D. C., Wallis J. J., Weingast B. R. Nasilie i sotsial’nye poriadki: Kontseptual’nye ramki dlia interpretatsii pis’mennoi istorii chelovechestva [Violence and Social Orders. A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorder Human History], tran. from eng. by D. Uzlaner, M. Markov, D. Raskov, A. Raskova. Moscow, Gaidar Institut Publ., 2011. 480 p. (In Russian)
O’Donnell G., Schmitter Ph. C. Defining Some Concepts (and Exposing Some Assumptions). Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Prospects for Democracy, еd. by G. O’Donnell, Ph. C. Schmitter, L. Whitehead. Vol. 4. Baltimore, 1986, pp. 9–13.
Patomaki H. After International Relations. Critical Realism and the (Re)Construction of World Politics. London, New York, Routledge, 2002. 288 p.
Patomaki H., Wight C. After Positivim? The Promises of Critical Realism. Theory of International Relations, 2006, vol. IV, pp. 231–245.
Pavlovsky G. Sistema RF. Istochniki rossiiskogo strategicheskogo povedeniia: metod G .F. Kennan [The RF System. Sources of Russian Strategic Behavior: G. F. Kennan Method]. Moscow, Evropa Publ., 2015. 180 p. (In Russian)
Petrenko V. F. Konstruktivizm kak metodologiia mnozhestvennosti model’nogo opisaniia i konstruirovaniia v poznanii [Constructivism as a methodology for the multiplicity of model description and construction in cognition]. Gumanitarnye osnovaniia sotsial’nogo progressa: Rossiia i sovremennost’ [The Humanitarian Foundations of Social Progress: Russia and the Present], pt. 1. Moscow, MGUDT, 2016, pp. 221–229. (In Russian)
Pipes R. Sobstvennost’ i svoboda [Property and Freedom]. Moscow, Moskovskaia shkola politichekskikh issledovanii, 2000.415 p. (In Russian)
Polanyi M. Lichnostnoe znanie [Personal Knowledge]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1977. 300 p. (In Russian)
Popper K. Otkrytoe obshchestvo i ego vragi [Open Society and its enemies], vols. 1–2. Moscow, Feniks Publ., 1992. 448 p. (In Russian)
Reus-Smit C. Constructivism. Theories of International Relations. Ed. by S. Burchill, A. Linklater, R. Devetak, M. Paterson, C. Reus-Smit, J. True. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. 212 p.
Sakwa R. Rezhimnaia sistema i grazhdanskoe obshchestvo v Rossii [Regime system and civil society in Russia], Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniia, 1997, no. 1, pp. 76–80. (In Russian)
Shapiro I. Begstvo gumanitarnykh nauk ot real’nosti [The Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences]. Moscow, VShE Publ., 2011. 368 p. (In Russian)
Sheigal E. I. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa [Semiotics of the Political Discourse]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 2004. 326 p. (In Russian)
Shmitter Ph. Razmyshleniia o «tranzitologii»: ran’she i teper’ [Reflections on “transitology”: before and now], Otechestvennye zapiski, 2013, no. 6 (57), pp. 8–25. (In Russian)
Sil R., Katzenstein P. Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics. New York, Palgrave, 2010. 280 p.
Sungurov A. Yu. Funktsii politicheskoi sistemy: ot zastoia k postperestroike [The Functions of the Political System: from Stagnation to the Post-perestroika]. St. Petersburg, SPb Tsentr «Strategiia» Publ., 1998. 288 p. (In Russian)
Tulchinskii G. L. Sotsial’nye tekhnologii i znanie [Social Technologies and the Knowledge]. Filosofskie nauki, 2014b, no. 10, pp. 20–29. (In Russian)
Tulchinskii G. Idei: istochniki, dinamika i logicheskoe soderzhanie [Ideas: Issues, Dynamics and Logical Content]. Istoriia idei kak metodologiia gumanitarnykh issledovanii [History of Ideas as Methodology of Humanitarian Studies]. St. Petersburg, Tsentr istorii idei Publ., 2001, pp. 28–58. (In Russian)
Tulchinskii G. Information wars as a conflict of interpretations: activating the ‘third party’. Russian Journal of Communication, 2013, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 244–251.
Tulchinskii G. L. Politicheskie transformatsii v Rossii i sovremennaia politicheskaia nauka [Political Transformations in Russia and Contemporary Political Science]. Neprikosnovennyi zapas, 2014a, no. 98 (6), pp. 95–112. (In Russian)
Tulchinskii G. L. Ob”iasnenie v politicheskoi nauke: konstruktivizm vs pozitivizm [Explanation in political science: constructivism vs positivism]. Publichnaia politika, 2017, no. 1, pp. 76–98. (In Russian)
Tulmin St. Kontseptual’nye revoliutsii v nauke [Conceptual Revolutions in Science]. The structure and development of science [Struktura i razvitie nauki]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1978, pp. 170–189. (In Russian)
Zamministra obrazovaniia Igor’ Fediukin: Mnogie rossiiskie dissertatsii ne vyderzhivaiut kritiki [Deputy Education Minister Igor Fedyukin: Many Russian dissertations do not stand up to criticism]. Available at: http://www.snob.ru/selected/entry/56786 (accessed: 30.11.2018). (In Russian)
Downloads
Published
2019-10-24
How to Cite
Tulchinskii, G. (2019). Three narratives of political science: perspectives of interdisciplinary political studies. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 15(2), 174–200. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu23.2019.202
Issue
Section
Political Science Methodology
License
Articles of "Political Expertise: POLITEX" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
