POLICIES OF STATES TOWARDS INTERNATIONAL ELECTION OBSERVATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2021.203Abstract
The article presents a study of policies of modern states regarding the institution of international election observation. The study is based on the application of constructivism and realism as the main theories of international relations to explain the actions of national governments in this area. The features of the institution of international election observation in the context of its compliance with the principle of state sovereignty are revealed. Despite the declaration of respect for state sovereignty, the practice of international election observation significantly limits state policy in the field of elections and practically defies national governments’ attempts to regulate it. The paradox and complexity of the current situation lies in the fact that national governments change their policies due to the influence of international observers, but governments cannot find a means to shape the international observation. The institution of international election observation not only eliminates the Westphalian understanding of state sovereignty, but also creates new forms of international accountability of national governments. Within the framework of constructivism, international observation is seen as an institution that promotes democratization and supports progressive trends within the country through the assistance of the international community. The theory of realism acts as the ideological basis for national governments seeking to limit the activities of observers. Within the framework of realism, international observers are viewed as representatives of foreign states that pose a threat to national interests. The article identifies and describes the main models and methods of policies of governments seeking to limit and control international observation. Short historical experience is also a factor that makes it difficult for national governments to choose effective means towards international observation.
Keywords:
election observation, international organizations, observers, electoral governance, constructivism
Downloads
References
Гришин Н. В. Комиссии по делимитации избирательных округов: становление и перспективы политического института // Полис. Политические исследования. 2018. № 4. С. 100–114. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.04.08
Гришин Н. В. Развитие международных избирательных стандартов: что дальше? // Политическая наука. 2019. № 1. С. 33–47. https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2019.01.02
Гришин Н. В., Линдерс А. М. Р. Децентрализация системы управления выборами // Полития: Анализ. Хроника. Прогноз (Журнал политической философии и социологии политики). 2020. № 3. С. 99–115. https://doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2020-98-3-99-115
Карцов А. С. Внешнее наблюдение за выборами: вклад Межпарламентской ассамблеи СНГ // Диалог: Политика, Право, Экономика. 2017. № 1 (4). С. 40–46.
Коргунюк Ю. Г. Опыт Организации американских государств по выработке международных избирательных стандартов // Каспийский регион: политика, экономика, культура. 2019. № 3 (60). С. 103–109.
Линдерс А. М. Международные отношения и технологическая обусловленность // Каспийский регион: политика, экономика, культура. 2020. № 1. С. 96–104. https://doi.org/10.21672/1818-510X-2020-62-1-096-104
Миронов С. М. Выступление Председателя Совета МПА СНГ, Председателя Совета Федерации Федерального Собрания Российской Федерации Сергея Миронова на семинаре для международных наблюдателей и консультантов на выборах в государственные органы власти. URL: http://postkomsg.kp.ru/news/politika/178581/ (дата обращения: 02.04.2021).
Морозова О. С. Роль Африканского Союза в регулировании избирательного процесса на континенте // Каспийский регион: политика, экономика, культура. 2019. № 3. С. 122–129.
Морозова О. С. Тенденции развития европейских неправительственных организаций в сфере выборов: на примере ENEMO // Выборы: теория и практика. 2020. № 1. С. 22–24
Письмо Постоянных представителей Гватемалы, Коста-Рики. Никарагуа и Сальвадора при ООН от 27 августа 1987 года на имя Генерального секретаря A/42/521/S /19085, 1987. URL: https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/CR%20HN%20GT%20NI%20SV_870807_EsquipulasII%28ru%29.pdf (дата обращения: 02.04.2021).
Попова О. В. Практики предотвращения незаконных избирательных технологий // Политическая экспертиза: ПОЛИТЭКС. 2015. Т. 11, № 3. С. 43–58.
Федоров Е. Запрет международных наблюдателей на выборах. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSgzoZ-31_Q (дата обращения: 02.04.2021).
Фисенко В. Н. Необходимость реформирования ОБСЕ // Актуальные проблемы международного публичного и международного частного права. Вып.1. Минск: БГУ, 2009. С. 151–172.
Шеховцов А. Проблемное международное наблюдение за парламентскими выборами в Азербайджане 2020 года. EPDE, 2020.Щербак И.Н. ОБСЕ: время реформ // Научно-аналитический вестник Института Европы РАН. 2020. № 6. С.52-58. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/vestnikieran620205258
Aaken A. van. Independent Electoral Management Bodies and International Election Observer Missions: Any Impact on the Observed Level of Democracy? A Conceptual Framework // Constitutional Political Economy. 2009. Vol. 20, is. 3. P. 296–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-008-9070-4Eschenbächer J-H., Knoll B. Observing Elections in “Long-Standing Democracies”: Added Value or Waste of Money? // OSCE Yearbook 2010 / IFSH, Baden-Baden 2011. P. 247–263.
Hyde S. D. The Pseudo-Democrat's Dilemma: Why Election Observation Became an International Norm. Cornell University Press, 2011. 263 p.
Laakso L. The politics of international election observation: the case of Zimbabwe in 2000 // The Journal of Modern African Studies. 2002. Vol. 40, is. 3. P. 437–464. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X02003993
March J. G., Olsen J.P. The Logic of Appropriateness. Oxford Handbooks Online / ed. by R. E. Goodin, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.013.0024
Rittberger V., Zangl B., Kruck A. International Organization. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. 300 p.
Statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on the Early Elections to Milli Majlis of the Republic of Azerbaijan Held on 9 February 2020, No: 031/20. URL: http://www.mfa.gov.az/en/news/6564/pno03120-statement-of-the-ministry-of-foreign-affairs-on-the-early-elections-to-milli-majlisof-the-republic-of-azerbaijan-held-on-9-february-2020p (дата обращения: 02.0.2021).
Stoelting D. The Challenge of UN-Monitored Elections in Independent Nations // Stanford Journal of International Law. 1992. Vol. 28. P. 371–424.
Wendt A. Driving with the Rearview Mirror: on the Rational Science of Institutional Design // International Organization. 2001. Vol. 55, is. 4. P. 1019–1049. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081801317193682
REFERENCES (In English)
Aaken A. van. Independent Electoral Management Bodies and International Election Observer Missions: Any Impact on the Observed Level of Democracy? A Conceptual Framework. Constitutional Political Economy, 2009, vol. 20, is. 3, pp. 296–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10602-008-9070-4
Eschenbächer J-H., Knoll B. Observing Elections in “Long-Standing Democracies”: Added Value or Waste of Money? In: IFSH (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2010, Baden-Baden 2011, pp. 247–263.
Fedorov E. Ban on international election observers. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSgzoZ-31_Q (accessed: 02.04.2021). (In Russian)
Fisenko V.N. The need to reform the OSCE. Actual problems of international public and international private law, 2009, no. 1, pp. 151–172. (In Russian)
Grishin N. Development of international electoral standards: what's next? // Political Science, 2019, no. 1, pp. 33–47. https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2019.01.02 (In Russian)
Grishin N. The Phenomenon of Constituency Boundaries Commission: Development and Prospects. Polis. Political Studies, 2018, no. 4, pp. 100–114. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.04.08 (In Russian)
Grishin N.V., Leenders A.M. Decentralization of electoral governance. Politeia-journal of Political Theory Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics, 2020, no. 3, pp. 99–115. https://doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2020-98-3-99-115 (In Russian)
Hyde S.D. The Pseudo-Democrat's Dilemma: Why Election Observation Became an International Norm. Cornell University Press, 2011.
Kartsov A. S. External observation of elections: the contribution of the CIS Interparliamentary Assembly. Dialogue: Politics, Law, Economics, 2017, no. 1(4), pp. 40–46. (In Russian)
Korgunyuk Yu. G. Experience of the Organization of American States in the Development of International Electoral Standards. Caspian Region: Politics, Economics, Culture, 2019, no. 3 (60), pp. 103–109. (In Russian)
Laakso L. The politics of international election observation: the case of Zimbabwe in 2000. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 2002, vol. 40, is. 3, pp. 437–464. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X02003993
Leenders A.M. International relations and technological causation. Caspian region: politics, economics, culture, 2020, no. 1, pp. 96–104. https://doi.org/10.21672/1818-510X-2020-62-1-096-104
Letter dated 87.08.27 from the Permanent Representatives of Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala and Nicaragua to the UN. A/42/521/S /19085, 1987 URL: https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/CR%20HN%20GT%20NI%20SV_870807_EsquipulasII%28ru%29.pdf (accessed: 02.04.2021).
March J. G. and Olsen J. P. The Logic of Appropriateness. Oxford Handbooks Online. Edited by Robert E. Goodin, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199604456.013.0024
Mironov S.M. Speech by the Chairman of the IPA CIS Council, Chairman of the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation Sergei Mironov at a seminar for international observers and consultants at elections to state authorities. URL: http://postkomsg.kp.ru/news/politika/178581/ (accessed: 02.04.2021). (In Russian)
Morozova O.S. The role of the African Union in regulating the electoral process on the continent. Caspian region: politics, economics, culture, 2019, no. 3, pp. 122–129. (In Russian)
Morozova O.S. Trends in the development of European non-governmental organizations in the field of elections: the example of ENEMO. Elections: theory and practice, 2020, no. 1, pp. 22–24. (In Russian)
Popova O. V. Practices of preventing illegal electoral technologies. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 2015, 11(3), pp. 43-58. (In Russian)
Rittberger V., Zangl B., Kruck A. International Organization. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. 300 p.
Shcherbak I.A. Time of Reforms. Scientific and Analytical Bulletin of the Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2020, 6, pp.52-58. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/vestnikieran620205258 (In Russian)
Shekhovtsov A. Problematic international observation of the 2020 parliamentary elections in Azerbaijan. EPDE, 2020.
Statement of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on the Early Elections to Milli Majlis of the Republic of Azerbaijan Held on 9 February 2020, No:031/20. URL: http://www.mfa.gov.az/en/news/6564/pno03120-statement-of-the-ministry-of-foreign-affairs-on-the-early-elections-to-milli-majlisof-the-republic-of-azerbaijan-held-on-9-february-2020p (accessed: 02.04.2021).
Stoelting D. The Challenge of UN-Monitored Elections in Independent Nations. Stanford Journal of International Law, 1992, vol. 28, pp. 371–424.
Wendt A. Driving with the Rearview Mirror: on the Rational Science of Institutional Design. International Organization, 2001, vol. 55, is. 4, pp. 1019–1049. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081801317193682
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles of "Political Expertise: POLITEX" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
