Digital governmentality: Participatory governance vs. biopolitics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2020.403Abstract
The notion of governmentality was first used by the French postmodern philosopher Michel Foucault during his lectures at the College de France in 1978-1979. The term is one of the characteristics of political power, along with sovereignty and discipline, but it characterizes its later stages of evolution. Foucault and his commentators give multiple meanings to this term, but perhaps the most accurate ones are the definition of governmentality as a way of rational thinking about the realization of political power and governmentality as the art of government. The emergence of governmentality is associated with the emergence of political economy and implies the use of biopolitical techniques, a concept that Foucault introduces to emphasize the need for socio-hu- manitarian knowledge in disciplining the “political body”. Evolution and peculiarities of biopolitics are discussed in detail in this article in relation to each type of governmentality. This article examines three types of governmentality (liberalism, authoritarianism, neoliberalism) introduced by the French thinker and proposes considering a new type of governmentality that characterizes the modern stage of society’s development. Here we use a governmentality concept as a methodological instrument for analysis of a new type of governance. The author notes that digital governmentality is characterized by governance using digital platforms. The article provides a detailed description of the architecture of one such platforms, as well as a set of algorithms that will mediate the interaction between the population and government representatives. The purpose of this article is to identify the essence of digital governmentality and its nature. Is the emerging form of public governance through digital platforms, as a consequence of its digitalization, demo- cratic and participatory, or is it still a more sophisticated way of governing the population using manipulative, biopolitical strategies? An attempt to answer this question is made in the article by considering both the evolution of the term governmentality itself and the technological features of digital platforms with their interpretation based on Michel Foucault’s concept.
Keywords:
Foucault, governmentality, biopolitics, rationality, digital platform
Downloads
References
Сморгунов Л. В. Блокчейн как институт процедурной справедливости // Полис. Политические исследования. 2018. № 5. С. 88–99. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.05.08
Фуко М. Рождение биополитики // Фуко М. Интеллектуалы и власть: избранные политические статьи, выступления и интервью. Ч. 3. Статьи и интервью, 1970–1984. М.: Праксис, 2006. С. 151–161.
Фуко М. Надзирать и наказывать: рождение тюрьмы. М.: Ad Marginem, 1999. 480 с.
Barreneche C. Governing the geocoded world: Environmentality and the politics of location platform // The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 2012. Vol. 18, No 3. P. 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856512442764
Barry L. The rationality of the digital governmentality // Journal for Cultural Research. 2020. P. 11–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2020.1714878.
Bentham J. The Theory of Legislation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1950. 422 p.
Capotti F., Liu D. Emerging platform urbanism in China: Reconfiguration of data, citizenship and materialities // Technological Forecasting & Social Change. 2020. Vol. 151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.016
Dean M. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publication Inc., 2010. 304 p.
Flyverbom M., Madsen A. K., Rasche A. Big Data as governmentality in international development: digital traces, algorithms and altered visibilities // The Information Societies. 2017. Vol. 33, No 1. P. 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2016.1248611
Foucault M. Security, Territory. Population. Lectures at the College de France, 1977–78. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. 417 p.
Foucault M. The Essential Works 1954–1984. Vol. 1: Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth. New York: The New Press, 1997. 486 p.
Karantjias A., Polemi N. An innovative platform architecture for complex secure e/m-governmental services // International Journal Electronic Security and Digital Forensics. 2009. Vol. 2, No 4. P. 338–354.
Larsson O. The governmentality of network governance: Collaboration as a new facet of the liberal art of governing // Constellation: an International Journal of Critical & Democracy Theory. 2020. Vol. 27, No 1. P. 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12447
Lemke T. Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique. Rethinking Marxism // A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society. 2002. Vol. 14, No 3. P. 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/089356902101242288
Lemke T. ‘The birth of bio-politics’: Michel Foucault’s lecture at the College de France on neo-liberal governmentality // Economy and Society. 2001. Vol. 30, No 2. P. 190–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140120042271
Rejali D. Torture and Modernity: Self, Society and State in Modern Iran. Boulder, Co: Westview Press, 1994. 176 p.
Schuilenburg M., Peeters R. Gift politics: Exposure and surveillance in the Anthropocene // Crime, Law and Social Change. 2017. Vol. 68, No 5. P. 563–578.
Smorgunov L. Digital platforms, affordance, and public governability // International Conferences ICT, Society, and Human Beings 2020; Connected Smart Cities 2020; and Web Based Communities and Social Media 2020. P. 219–224.
Smorgunov L. Russian movement for ‘open government’: issues of civic engagement in politics // International Journal of Electronic Governance. 2016. Vol. 8, No 3. P. 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2016.081387
Souto-Otero M., Beneito-Montagut R. From governing through data to governmentality through data: Artefacts, strategies and the digital turn // European Educational Research Journal. 2016. Vol. 15, No 1. P. 14–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904115617768
Whitson J. Foucault’s fitbit: Governance and gamification // Deterding S., Walz P. (eds.). The Gameful World. Boston: MIT Press, 2015. P. 339–358.
Zanotti L. Governmentality, Ontology, Methodology: Re-thinking Political Agency in the Global World // Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. 2013. Vol. 38, No 4. P. 288–304. https://doi.org/10.2307/24569418
REFERENCES (In English)
Barreneche, C. Governing the geocoded world: Environmentality and the politics of location platform. The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 2012, vol. 18, no 3, pp. 331-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856512442764
Barry L. The rationality of the digital governmentality. Journal for Cultural Research, 2020, pp. 11-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2020.1714878.
Bentham J. The Theory of Legislation. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1950. 422 p.
Capotti F., Liu D. Emerging platform urbanism in China: Reconfiguration of data, citizenship and materialities. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 151(February), 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.016
Dean M. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. Second Edition. London: SAGE Publication Inc., 2010. 304 p.
Flyverbom M., Madsen A.K., Rasche A. Big Data as governmentality in international development: digital traces, algorithms and altered visibilities. The Information Societies, 2017, vol. 33, no 1, pp. 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2016.1248611
Foucault M. Security, Territory. Population. Michel Foucault, Lectures at the College de France. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. 417 p.
Foucault M. The birth of biopolitics. M. Foucault Intellektualy i vlast': izbrannye politicheskie stat'i, vystuplenija i interv'ju. Ch. 3. Stat'i i interv'ju, 1970-1984. Мoscow, Praksis Publ., 2006, pp. 151-161. (Rus. Ed.)
Foucault M. Supervise and punish: the birth of a prison. Мoscow, Ad Marginem Publ., 1999. 480 p. (Rus. Ed.)
Foucault M. The Essential Works 1954-1984. Vol. 1: Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth. New York: The New Press, 1997. 486 p.
Karantjias A., Polemi N. An innovative platform architecture for complex secure e/m-governmental services. International Journal Electronic Security and Digital Forensics, 2009, vol. 2, no 4, pp. 338–354.
Larsson O. The governmentality of network governance: Collaboration as a new facet of the liberal art of governing. Constellation: an International Journal of Critical & Democracy Theory, 2020, vol. 27, no 1, pp. 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12447
Lemke T. Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique. Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture & Society, 2002, vol. 14, no 3, pp. 49-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/089356902101242288
Lemke T. ‘The birth of bio-politics’: Michel Foucault’s lecture at the College de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Economy and Society, 2001, vol. 30, no 2, pp. 190-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140120042271
Rejali D. Torture and Modernity: Self, Society and State in Modern Iran. Boulder, Co: Westview Press, 1994. 176 p.
Schuilenburg M., Peeters R. Gift politics: Exposure and surveillance in the Anthropocene. Crime, Law and Social Change, 2017, vol. 68, no 5, pp. 563–578.
Smorgunov L. Digital platforms, affordance, and public governability. International Conferences ICT, Society, and Human Beings 2020; Connected Smart Cities 2020; and Web Based Communities and Social Media 2020, pp. 219-224.
Smorgunov L. Blockchain as an institution of procedural justice. Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija, 2018, no 5, pp. 88-99. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.05.08. (In Russian)
Smorgunov L. Russian movement for ‘open government’: issues of civic engagement in politics. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 2016, vol. 8, no 3, pp. 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2016.081387
Souto-Otero M., Beneito-Montagut R. From governing through data to governmentality through data: Artefacts, strategies and the digital turn. European Educational Research Journal, 2016, vol. 15, no 1, pp. 14–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904115617768
Whitson J. Foucault’s fitbit: Governance and gamification. Deterding and S Walz (eds.,). The Gameful World. Boston: MIT Press, 2015. pp. 339358.
Zanotti L. Governmentality, Ontology, Methodology: Re-thinking Political Agency in the Global World. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 2013, vol. 38, no 4, pp. 288-304. https://doi.org/10.2307/24569418
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles of "Political Expertise: POLITEX" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
