CONVERGENCE OF TELEVISION AND THE INTERNET IN RUSSIA: POLITICAL ASPECT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2020.104Abstract
The convergence of television and cyberspace is the final stage of traditional media and Internet integration. In connection with this, the social role of television is changing. The culture of consumption of television products is becoming different, and the transformation of the television audience is noticeable. Inevitably the question arises of new functions and a new strategy for the development of television in a post-global information individualized society. The authors consider such aspects of television transformation as a transition from the public sphere type to the filter bubble and echo chamber types. An alternative to traditional television on the Internet is stream- ing services and YouTube, the integration of which into the information space of the post-globalist nation-state remains controversial. Convergence of the Internet and television takes place both in the form of social television and in the form of representation of cyberspace in traditional television formats. Researchers focus on the Russian specifics of convergence of television and the Internet. The study examined the case of the use of Twitter microblogging materials in the TV program Time will tell on the Russian First Channel. An empirical analysis of tweets was made and the main patterns of communication were revealed in the program Time will tell.
Keywords:
bot, troll, social television, echo chamber, public sphere, twitter, public broadcasting, filter bubble, internet governance, Governance
Downloads
References
Бодрунова С.С. Концепции публичной сферы и медиакратическая теория: поиск точек соприкосновения // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. 2011. No 1. С. 110–132.
Вартанова Е.Л. Телевидение цифровой эпохи: к постсетевой и интерактивной модели // От центрального к цифровому: Телевидение в России / под ред. В.В.Струкова, В.В.Зве- рева. Воронеж: Воронежский гос. пед. ун-т, 2014. С. 1–26.
Вартанова Е.Л. Цифровое телевидение и трансформация медиасистем. О необходимо- сти междисциплинарных подходов к изучению современного ТВ // Вестник Московского уни- верситета. Сер. 10: Журналистика. 2011, No 4. С. 6–26.
Зиновьев А.О. Дискурс и государство // Политическая экспертиза: ПОЛИТЭКС, 2008. No 4 (1), с.261–273.
Ковалев П.А. Российская телевизионная аудитория: дифференциация и типологические группы: автореф. дис. ... канд. социол. наук. М.: Московский гуманитар. ун-т, 2006. 22 с.
Малеина Е.А. Культурология медиапространства (интеграция традиционных СМИ и Ин- тернета) // Ярославский педагогический вестник. 2015. No 5. С. 366–371.
Мартьянов Д.С. Политический бот как профессия // Политическая экспертиза: ПОЛИ- ТЭКС. 2016. Т.12, No 1. С.74–89.
Мартьянов Д.С., Быков И.А. Идеологическая сегрегация и цифровое неравенство в рос- сийском интернет-сообществе // Социодинамика. 2018. No 4. С. 43–55.
Новиков А. Эффект «второго экрана» и социальное телевидение // Бизнес. Общество. Власть. 2012. No 11. С.64–72.
Паризер Э. За стеной фильтров. Что Интернет скрывает от вас? / пер. с англ. А. Ширико- ва. М.: Альпина Бизнес Букс. 2012. 304 с.
Полуэхтова И.А. Динамика мотивационной структуры телепотребления россиян // Ме- диаскоп. 2018. Вып. 4. URL: // http://www.mediascope.ru/2508 (дата обращения: 20.06.2019).
Старченков А.П. Телевидение как инструмент формирования мировоззрения современ- ной молодежи Германии // Культура и цивилизация. 2016. No 1. С. 169–183.
Структура и дискурс виртуальной элиты 2.0 в России. Монографическое исследование / под ред. Д.С.Мартьянова. СПб.: ЭлекСис, 2017. 124 c.
Тоффлер Э. Третья волна. М.: Издательство ACT, 1999. 784 с.
Щепилова Г.Г., Круглова Л.А. Телеканалы и социальные сети: специфика взаимодей- ствия // Вестник Московского университета. Сер. 10: Журналистика. 2018. No 3. С. 3–16.
Abercrombie N., Longhurst B. Audiences: A Sociological Theory of Performance and Imagina- tion. London: Sage, 1998.
Cooke L. A visual convergence of print, television, and the internet: Charting 40 years of design change in news presentation. New Media & Society — NEW MEDIA SOC. 7. 2005. P. 22–46.
Fish A. Participatory Television: Convergence, Crowdsourcing, and Neoliberalism. Communica- tion, Culture and Critique. Vol.6. Iss. 3. September 2013. P.372–395.
Flow TV: television in the age of media convergence / ed. by M. Kackman et al. New York: Rou- tledge. 2011. 291 p.
Habermas J. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991.
Holmes S., Jermyn D.The audience is dead; Long live the audience! Interactivity, ‘telephilia’ and the contemporary television audience. Critical Studies in Television. 2006. Vol.1(1). P.49–57.
Jenkins H. Convergence culture. New York: New York University Press. 2006. Livingstone S. The participation paradigm in audience research. Communication Review. 2013. Vol.16. P.1–2, 21–30.
Longhurst B., Bagnall G., Savage M. Audiences, museums and the English middle class // Museum and society, Jul 2004. Iss. 2 (2). P.104–124.
Nealon J. T. Post-postmodernism; or, The Logic of Just-in-Time Capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 2012.
Rosen J. The people formerly known as the audience. 2006. Retrieved Oct 23, 2011. URL: http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/06/27/ppl_frmr.html (дата обращения: 20.06.2019).
Sunstein C. R. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 2009.
Volkmer I. The Global Public Sphere: Public. Communication in the Age of Reflective. Interdependence. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2014. 225 p.
REFERENCES (In English)
Abercrombie N., Longhurst B. Audiences: A Sociological Theory of Performance and Imagina- tion. London, Sage, 1998.
Bodrunova S.S. Concepts of the public sphere and media theory: the search for common ground. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii, 2011, no. 1, pp. 110–132. (In Russian)
Cooke L. A visual convergence of print, television, and the internet: Charting 40 years of design change in news presentation. New Media & Society — NEW MEDIA SOC. 7. 2005, pp. 22–46.
Fish A. Participatory Television: Convergence, Crowdsourcing, and Neoliberalism. Communica- tion, Culture and Critique, 2013, vol. 6, iss. 3, pp. 372–395.
Flow TV: television in the age of media convergence. Ed. by M.Kackman et al. New York, Routledge, 2011, 291 p.
Habermas J. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1991.
Holmes S., Jermyn D. The audience is dead; Long live the audience! Interactivity, ‘telephilia’ and the contemporary television audience. Critical Studies in Television, 2006, vol. 1(1), pp. 49–57.
Jenkins H. Convergence culture. New York, New York University Press. 2006.
Kovalev P.A. Russian television audience: differentiation and typological groups: authoref. dis. ... kand. sotsiol. nauk. Moscow, Moskovskii gumanitar. un-t, 2006, 22 p. (In Russian)
Livingstone S. The participation paradigm in audience research. Communication Review, 2013, no. 16, pp. 1–2, 21–30.
Longhurst B., Bagnall G., Savage M. Audiences, museums and the English middle class. Muse- um and society, 2004, no. 2 (2), pp. 104–124.
Maleina E. A. Cultural studies of the media space (integration of traditional media and the Inter- net). Iaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik, 2015, no. 5, pp. 366–371. (In Russian)
Martyanov D. S. Political bot as a profession. Politicheskaia ekspertiza: POLITEKS, 2016, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 74–89. (In Russian)
Martyanov D. S., Bykov I. A. Ideological segregation and the digital divide in the Russian Internet community. Sotsiodinamika, 2018, no. 4, pp. 43–55. (In Russian)
Nealon J. T. Post-postmodernism; or, The Logic of Just-in-Time Capitalism. Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2012.
Novikov A. Second Screen Effect and Social Television. Biznes. Obshchestvo. Vlast’, 2012, no. 11, pp. 64–72. (In Russian)
Pariser E. Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Rus. ed. Moscow: Al’pina Biznes Buks Publ., 2012, 304 p. (In Russian)
Poluekhtova I. A. The dynamics of the motivational structure of television consumption of Rus- sians. Mediaskop, 2018, vol. 4. URL: http://www.mediascope.ru/2508 (accessed: 20.06.2019). (In Russian)
Rosen J. The people formerly known as the audience. 2006. Retrieved Oct 23, 2011. URL: http://archive.pressthink.org/2006/06/27/ppl_frmr.html (accessed: 20.06.2019).
Shchepilova G.G., Kruglova L.A. TV channels and social networks: the specifics of interaction. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 10. Zhurnalistika, 2018, no. 3, pp. 3–16. (In Russian)
Starchenkov A.P. Television as a tool for shaping the worldview of modern youth in Germany. Kul’tura i tsivilizatsiia, 2016, no. 1, pp. 169–183. (In Russian)
Sunstein C. R. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, Princeton University Press. 2009.
The structure and discourse of virtual elite 2.0 in Russia. Monograficheskoe issledovanie. Ed. by D.S.Martyanov. St. Petersburg, ElekSis Publ., 2017, 124 p. (In Russian)
Toffler E. Third wave. Moscow, AST Publ., 1999, 784 p. (In Russian)
Vartanova E.L.Digital television and the transformation of media systems. On the need for multidisciplinary approaches to the study of modern TV. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 10. Zhurnalistika, 2011, vol. 4, pp. 6–26. (In Russian)
Vartanova E. L. Digital Television: Toward a Post-Network and Interactive Model. Ot tsentral’no- go k tsifrovomu: Televidenie v Rossii. Eds V. V. Strukov, V. V. Zverev. Voronezh: Voronezhskii gos. ped. un-t, 2014, pp. 1–26. (In Russian)
Volkmer I. The Global Public Sphere: Public. Communication in the Age of Reflective. Interde- pendence. Cambridge, UK, Polity, 2014, 225 p.
Zinovev A.O. Discourse and the state. Politicheskaia ekspertiza: POLITEKS, 2008, no. 4 (1), pp. 261–273.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles of "Political Expertise: POLITEX" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
